The Right Office
A rebuild of a business-services provider's site, from a fixed-width layout into a full-width one organised around six services and the one visitor they share. The design shows all six as one set of cards, opens the office cards with the visitor's own questions, and keeps a long list of inclusions in full while making it scannable. Each decision below is tied to the usability heuristic it serves.
Problem & Usability Gaps
The site being replaced was built for a desktop monitor: a fixed-width column with small body text. Read against the heuristics, the six services appeared only as text links in a side menu, so a visitor had to know which label fitted their situation before learning anything about it; the home page itself was a column of prose; and the most useful content on the site, the list of what an office includes, sat in a small box at the foot of the page.
Design Decisions by Heuristic
Before & After by Heuristic
| Heuristic | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Services as menu links | Six cards with photo and summary | Visible |
| Consistency | Side menu above a column of prose | One card pattern for all six | Unified |
| Real-world | The provider's own description | Office cards open with the visitor's questions | Relatable |
| Minimalism | Small box at the foot of the page | Own section, kept in full | Scannable |
"The six services look unrelated until you notice they are the same visitor in the same month. Showing them as one set of cards is what lets a single visit cover all of them."
— Design rationale · The Right OfficeDesign Learnings
Opening a card with the question it answers lets a visitor self-select faster than a description of the service; it works best where the questions are easy to state, as they were for the office cards.
A dense list is not automatically something to delete; when it is the content people need, the minimalist fix is structure rather than removal.
When several services share one customer, a shared card pattern tells the visitor they belong together more clearly than copy saying so.

